What is Just According to Nature? | A Conference on the Dispute Between Thomas Aquinas
and Leo Strauss | Apr. 1, 2022
Keynote Speaker: James Carey, Ph.D. | St. John's College
Dr. Carey graduated from the University of North Carolina with a BA in music. He received
his MA in and his PhD, both in philosophy, from The Graduate Faculty of The New School
for Social Research. In addition to serving as Tutor, and twice as Dean, at St. John’s
College, Santa Fe, he has served as Distinguished Visiting Professor in the Department
of Philosophy at the United States Air Force Academy from 2004 to 2007, from 2009
to 2014, and from 2016 to the present. Dr. Carey’s primary research interests center
on logic and metaphysics in the history of philosophy. He has been an invited speaker
at universities across the country, including Tulane University and Catholic University
of America. In his talks, Dr. Carey has addressed topics such as medieval proofs of
the existence of God and the relation between philosophy and religious belief. Most
recently, he has written Natural Reason and Natural Law: An Assessment of the Straussian Criticisms of Thomas
Aquinas, which defends Thomistic natural law theory as genuinely grounded in human nature
and practical reason.
We are pleased to announce a conference, “What is Just According to Nature? A Dispute
Between Thomas Aquinas and Leo Strauss.” Addressing the fundamental questions at the
heart of natural law theory, the conference aims to clarify the ground of the disagreement
between Thomas Aquinas and Leo Strauss on such questions as the knowability of natural
law and the relation between theology and natural law. Although there are important
affinities between the Straussian and Thomistic approaches to the question of natural
justice—e.g., an understanding of nature as normative and of human nature as essentially
unchanging throughout history, as well as a defense of the contemplation of the truth
as the highest human activity—there are also important points of tension which, when
examined, enable us to better see what is distinctive in each approach.
To this end, the University of Dallas has invited a select group of scholars to discuss
the basic themes of this dispute as framed by Dr. James Carey in his book, Natural Reason and Natural Law: An Assessment of the Straussian Criticisms of Thomas
Aquinas. We envision the conference as a friendly dialogue between scholars whose thoughtful
disagreement on this topic can help us to grasp the basic problems that inhere in
the philosophic quest for justice.
The Greek philosophers understood philosophy to be the right way of life for those
who have the ability and the opportunity to live it. Biblical revelation poses a
challenge to this understanding. In responding to the Biblical challenge, the followers
of the Greek philosophers do not wish to take it on faith, inconsistently, that the
way of faith is inferior to philosophy. Instead, they wish to demonstrate that revelation
is impossible, or at least that belief in revelation rests on moral presuppositions
that do not withstand rational scrutiny. Dr. Carey's paper, “Reflections on the Possibility
of Revelation,” attempts both to clarify the idea of revelation and to show that the
moral presuppositions of belief are invulnerable to philosophical critique.
Access Dr. Carey's article.
An Overview of the Article.