Psychology Professor Helps Ban Psychologists from Interrogations
In Defense of Human Dignity
Originally Published in Summer 2016 Tower
“I couldn't be at UD for 35 years and not be influenced by the high moral standards
and ethical commitments,” said Professor of Psychology Scott D. Churchill.
Last summer, a Chicago lawyer commissioned by the American Psychological Association
(APA) found that prominent psychologists in the APA had cooperated with government
officials to enable psychologists to assist with harsh interrogation techniques used
by the CIA and the Pentagon after 9/11.
This was no surprise to Churchill (an APA Fellow and a council representative for
the Society of Humanistic Psychology), who had been working to get the APA out of
this situation for several years.
In August 2015, he was a key sponsor of a bill adopted by the APA to ban any involvement
of psychologists in national security interrogations. The historic motion was approved
with an unprecedented vote of 157-1 and affects the APA’s 122,000 members.
“It was an emotional and cathartic moment,” said Churchill.
The resolution, which provides a clear prohibition preventing psychologists from working
in any setting that the United Nations has declared to be in violation of international
law, brings the APA in line with other large health-related associations such as the
American Medical Association; its implementation was named by Discover magazine as
No. 34 in the top 100 science stories of 2015. On Dec. 31, 2015, psychologists were
pulled from the U.S. naval base in Guantánamo Bay, a significant triumph and an example
of the resolution in action.
Churchill is a noted scholar of phenomenology, animal behavior and psychology of film,
as well as a Minnie Stevens Piper Professor and a Fellow of the Dallas Institute of
Humanities and Culture.